LAWYERS BURGUERA

Lawyers, Legal advice to businesses and individuals

entrenchment clause

¿Puede ser consumidor el fiador de una empresa?

Published 16 July, 2019 | By Drafting,,es,Fire insurance,,es,The insurance company is responsible in case of inaccuracy of the information provided by its own agent,,es,The policyholder must act as diligently as possible. & Nbsp; You must declare the circumstances that modify the risk in a damage insurance,,es,& nbsp; But it is the insurer who has to face the consequences if your agent had made an error in completing an amendment to the contract policy. & Nbsp; & nbsp;,,es,The Supreme Court has ruled in the STS,,es,about this matter,,es,in which a policyholder who signs a multi-risk contract with an insurer,,es,subsequently he encounters various problems in order to obtain the pertinent compensation,,es

The consumer guarantor maintains that condition in a loan to a company

Continue reading →

Posted in Banking Lawyer, Banking, Banco Santander, Blog, entrenchment clause, Unfair terms, Commission for debit positions, Commission claim debit positions, Loan contract, Bond, Interest on arrears, Interest on late payments, Sentences unfair terms, sear sentences, Sentencias intereses abusivos, Vencimiento anticipado | Tagged strengthening, clausula abusiva, entrenchment clause Valencia, entrenchment clause, bail clause, unfair terms, clausulas abusivas consumidores y usuarios, Commission debtor position, fiador solidario, bond, joint surety, predatory interests, delay interest, deposit annulment, vencimiento anticipado | Leave a comment

Nullity of a consolidation clause in Madrid,,es,Nullity of a clause of entrenchment in Madrid,,es,About sales outside the zone in the franchise agreement,,es,Life insurance and health questionnaire in Pontevedra,,es,Concerning the sentencing in costs in case of estimation of a subsidiary petition,,es,About the condition in the cost of a subsidiary petition,,es,On the absence of unfair delay,,es

Published 29 May, 2019 | By Drafting,,es,Fire insurance,,es,The insurance company is responsible in case of inaccuracy of the information provided by its own agent,,es,The policyholder must act as diligently as possible. & Nbsp; You must declare the circumstances that modify the risk in a damage insurance,,es,& nbsp; But it is the insurer who has to face the consequences if your agent had made an error in completing an amendment to the contract policy. & Nbsp; & nbsp;,,es,The Supreme Court has ruled in the STS,,es,about this matter,,es,in which a policyholder who signs a multi-risk contract with an insurer,,es,subsequently he encounters various problems in order to obtain the pertinent compensation,,es

Los clientes deben ser informados por la entidad bancaria de las consecuencias de las cláusulas de afianzamiento

Continue reading →

Posted in Anular un aval, Guarantees, Blog, entrenchment clause, Unfair terms, Renuncia, sear sentences, Sentencias nulidad renuncia | Tagged strengthening, clausula abusiva, clausula afianzamiento Madrid, entrenchment clause, bail clause, unfair terms, clausulas abusivas consumidores y usuarios, control de incorporacion, control transparency, excusion orden y division, fiador solidario, bond, joint surety, deposit annulment, resignation | Leave a comment

¿Cómo liberar al fiador en una ejecución hipotecaria?

Published 30 October, 2018 | By Y.C.Z Writing,,es,Y.C.Z.,,es,The obligation of declaration of the policyholder is understood to be fulfilled by answering the questionnaire presented by the insurer,,es,First instance,,es,Duty of declaration of risk - art,,es,Form of the health questionnaire,,es,This was considered by the Section,,es,of the Provincial Court of Valencia in sentencing,,es,based on the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court in this respect,,es,Bernabé signed a total temporary disability insurance policy with La Previsión Mallorquina de Seguros S.A,,es,during your work,,es,he suffered an injury that caused him a temporary discharge due to common contingencies,,es,May of the same year he underwent surgery,,es.

En caso de ejecución hipotecaria contra la sociedad prestataria, el fiador puede quedar liberado al aplicarse la normativa de consumidores

Continue reading →

Posted in Banking, Blog, Unfair terms, Foreclosure, Bond, Mortgages, Mortgage loan, Sentencias ejecucion hipotecaria, sear sentences | Tagged strengthening, Cádiz, clausula abusiva, entrenchment clause, bail clause, unfair terms, clausulas abusivas consumidores y usuarios, clausulas abusivas hipotecas, control de incorporacion, control transparency, Foreclosure, fiador solidario, bond, joint surety, hipotecante no deudor, deposit annulment, Oviedo, responsabilidad ilimitada, Zaragoza | Leave a comment

Sobre la nulidad de la cláusula de afianzamiento

Published 11 September, 2018 | By Y.C.Z Writing,,es,Y.C.Z.,,es,The obligation of declaration of the policyholder is understood to be fulfilled by answering the questionnaire presented by the insurer,,es,First instance,,es,Duty of declaration of risk - art,,es,Form of the health questionnaire,,es,This was considered by the Section,,es,of the Provincial Court of Valencia in sentencing,,es,based on the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court in this respect,,es,Bernabé signed a total temporary disability insurance policy with La Previsión Mallorquina de Seguros S.A,,es,during your work,,es,he suffered an injury that caused him a temporary discharge due to common contingencies,,es,May of the same year he underwent surgery,,es.

Entrenchment clauses in mortgage loans may be considered abusive general terms of recruitment and therefore null

Continue reading →

Posted in Banking, Blog, entrenchment clause, Unfair terms, Bond, Mortgages, Sentences unfair terms | Tagged strengthening, clausula abusiva, entrenchment clause, bail clause, unfair terms, clausulas abusivas consumidores y usuarios, clausulas abusivas hipotecas, control de incorporacion, control transparency, fiador solidario, bond, joint surety, deposit annulment | Leave a comment

¿Se puede anular la cláusulula de afianzamiento de un préstamo hipotecario?

Published 2 August, 2018 | By Redaccion A.G.X.

El doble control de transparencia puede librarle de su cláusula de afianzamiento en un préstamo con garantía hipotecaria

Continue reading →

Posted in Banking, Blog, entrenchment clause, Nulidad fianza, Sentencias clausula afianzamiento | Tagged strengthening, clausula abusiva, entrenchment clause, bail clause, unfair terms, clausulas abusivas consumidores y usuarios, clausulas abusivas hipotecas, control de incorporacion, control transparency, fiador solidario, bond, joint surety, deposit annulment, responsabilidad ilimitada | Leave a comment

LAWYERS BURGUERA. Copyright © 2019. All Rights Reserved.